Research has shown that children of high-level conflict families carry the marks and scars of the conflict. It is not the separation of the parents, but rather the way the parents interact that creates these problems.
Read more here.
Sending an email to us will not make us your lawyers. You will not be considered a client of the firm until we have agreed to act for you in accordance with our usual policies for accepting clients. Unless you are a current client of Bales Beall LLP, please do not include any confidential information in your emails, because no information you send us can be held in confidence, and no information we provide to you can be treated by you as legal advice, unless and until we have agreed to act for you.
I Agree
Karon C. Bales is a founding partner of Bales Beall LLP. Her practice is centred on family law, and estate planning plus their interrelated litigation.
read more →
A founding partner of Bales Beall LLP, Charles Beall’s practice focuses on resolving estate, family wealth and family-owned business related disputes.
read more →
Research has shown that children of high-level conflict families carry the marks and scars of the conflict. It is not the separation of the parents, but rather the way the parents interact that creates these problems.
Read more here.
Across Ontario, numerous families provide support to adult children who are unable achieve financial independence due to a disability, mental health or other issues. There are estate planning tools that address the concern of providing on-going support for dependant adult children after the death of the supporting parent. Read more
Originally appeared in Deadbeat, Vol. 27 No. 4 May 2009, published by the Ontario Bar Association
Click here for full issue
Removing an attorney for property is notoriously difficult. Great deference is afforded to the incapable person’s choice for attorney provided in a valid power of attorney (POA). On September 12, 2008, Justice Fragomeni issued a landmark decision in Re Schaefers Estate (1) wherein the attorney for property of an incapable person was removed. While “strong and compelling evidence of misconduct or neglect” must be established, this case illustrates that the threshold for removal is lower than Ontario counsel may have previously believed. Read more